Skip to main content

Public methodology

How FootmeshAI explains a football match

FootmeshAI explains football matches through a three-lens methodology: structured match facts, prediction model probabilities, KG evidence, market signals, quality gates and clear uncertainty labels.

Methodology key questions

Before using the methodology, answer four questions

The methodology page turns every match read back into facts, model lens, change conditions and a reviewable workspace route.

1

Match facts first

Every analysis starts with the fixture, teams, competition, kickoff time, score state, recent form, head-to-head context and available statistics.

2

Model output as one lens

1X2 probabilities, goals outlook, BTTS, score ranges and risk flags are treated as model evidence, not as guaranteed outcomes or isolated recommendations.

3

KG and market context

KG Intelligence links the match to related entities while market movement, odds shifts and company split are displayed as changing context signals.

Quality gates

Explainability matters more than filling the page

Language-safe display: non-Chinese pages do not use Chinese entity names or Chinese body text as visible fallback.
Availability labels: unavailable, partial, stale, simulated and production-ready states must remain visible.
No invented facts: missing lineups, injuries, statistics or model output stay missing instead of being guessed.
Human-readable uncertainty: model probabilities are paired with change conditions and risk notes.

Reading policy

FootmeshAI does not turn probability into certainty

The product is designed to place scores, fixtures, team form, statistics, KG facts, model probabilities and market movement into one evidence matrix and research session before returning to the match workspace. Model output may change as coverage, time, lineups, markets and match state change.

Verification protocol

Verify the evidence boundary before saving a read

The methodology page is not a glossary of model terms. It gives every match read a reviewable route: where the facts came from, which lens the model represents, and what changes would make the read worth revisiting.

Step 1

Trace the facts

Start from the fixture, teams, league, time, score state, injuries, lineups and statistics that are actually available on the match page.

Step 2

Compare the lenses

Read model probabilities together with KG context, market movement and recent form instead of treating any single signal as the answer.

Step 3

Keep the uncertainty

Save the read only after coverage, freshness, missing-data notes and change conditions are clear enough to revisit later.

Next step

Bring the methodology back into your workspace

After reading the methodology, return to the match route first: choose a fixture, open the AI brief, ask, review changes, coverage, the evidence matrix and the research session, then return to the match workspace before keeping useful work in My FootmeshAI.

Match route

Choose a fixture, then continue through AI brief, Evidence review, change watchlist, coverage, evidence matrix, research session and match workspace.

Back to match center

My FootmeshAI

Return to saved matches, reminders, recent reads and the personal AI brief.

Open My FootmeshAI

Saved matches

Keep priority fixtures in the watchlist and return when data changes.

Open watchlist